Mortgage lenders face CDD obligations that are often misunderstood and inconsistently applied. Here's what examiners want to see and how to build a CDD program that passes scrutiny without slowing down your loan pipeline.
Mortgage lenders occupy an interesting compliance position. You're subject to BSA obligations, but your transaction flow looks nothing like a bank. You're not handling ongoing accounts or daily transactions — you're processing large, infrequent transactions that often involve international funds, complex ownership structures, and income sources that require careful documentation.
The core of mortgage CDD is source-of-funds verification. Examiners want to see that you've asked where the down payment came from, documented the answer, and followed up on any aspects that don't make sense. "The borrower said it was from savings" is not documentation — it's a paraphrase. Your file needs to show the actual evidence.
Third-party originator risk is the most commonly under-addressed CDD obligation in our reviews of South Florida mortgage programs. If you're accepting loan applications through brokers or correspondent lenders, you have a due diligence obligation to those relationships as well as to the end borrowers. Examiners are increasingly focusing here.
The good news is that mortgage CDD doesn't have to be complicated. A well-designed checklist, a clear escalation process for red flags, and consistent documentation practices will satisfy most examination requirements and, more importantly, actually catch the risks you're supposed to be managing.